Back in 2007 I read a fascinating article called “The Checklist” written by Dr. Atul Gawande in the New Yorker. Atul Gawande is a practicing surgeon, MacArthur Fellow, Rhodes Scholar and professor at Harvard Medical School and Harvard School of Public Health. The article described how a doctor convinced a group of hospitals in Michigan to do a wide-spread trial of a simple experiment: a checklist. The checklist aimed simply at making sure staff completed five key steps to limit central line infections, an unfortunately common source of infections in hospitals.

The result?

In one hospital:

  • 10-day infection rate went from 11% to ZERO
  • Prevented 8 deaths
  • Saved $2million in costs

Across ICU’s in Michigan:

  • In three months cut infections by 66%!
  • Typical ICU cut infection rate to ZERO
  • In 18 months, prevented 1500+ deaths
  • In 18 months, saved $175,000,000

These are amazing results, and his book on checklists, “The Checklist Manifesto,” was recently published. Click below to order it from Amazon.

This book is inspiring, educational, engaging, riveting and fascinating. It’s extremely well-written, and is a fairly easy read. I’ve never written a blog post immediately after finishing a book, but I am now because not only is it GOOD, but this book is IMPORTANT.

Dr. Gawande led a huge study of a “safe surgery” checklist, a simple set of steps to be checked in each surgery. It was used and studied in eight hospitals: four in the developed world (US, UK, etc.) and four in the developing world (Tanzania, New Delhi, Jordan, Manila). Thousands of patients were studied for months before and after checklists were implemented. The results?

  • Rate of complications fell by 36%
  • Deaths fell by 47%
  • Infections fell by nearly half
  • Even in advanced hospitals in developed world, complications were decreased by one-third

I mean…. WOW! Cutting infection rates and death rates in surgery by half (with marginal differences between developed and developing countries) is simply incredible.

But here’s a choice quote from the book:

Take the safe surgery checklist. If someone discovered a new drug that could cut down surgical complications with anything remotely like the effectiveness of the checklist, we would have television ads with minor celebrities extolling its virtues. Detail men would offer free lunches to doctors to make it part of their practice. Government programs would research it. Competitors would jump in to make newer and better versions. If the checklist were a medical device, we would have surgeons clamoring for it, lining up at display booths at surgical conferences to give it a try, hounding their hospital administrators to get one for them – because, damn it, doesn’t providing good care matter to those pencil pushers?

Checklists are powerful, and not just for surgery. Gawande writes about data from investment managers and venture capitalists that shows that those that use checklists are much more successful than those that don’t. They’ve been used in aviation for 70+ years, ever since airplanes became so complicated as to be dangerous without checklists. The modern construction industry uses checklists to ensure their projects are safe and properly constructed.

I’m very familiar with checklists; operating a nuclear reactor in a US Navy submarine means you live with checklists in everything you do. But I accepted it without too much thought since we had no idea there was any other way of running such a complicated machine. It’s amazing to me that other complex professions don’t also use the same procedures.

Checklists are threatening to many people and professions. Using them implies that professionals don’t know what they’re doing, that they don’t have the ability to do their jobs. Even with the results described in surgery above, many surgeons still don’t use them. (Despite the fact that they continually prove to save patients’ lives, everywhere.) As Dr. Gawande describes above, if the same results were achieved through a pill or machine, doctors and hospitals would be racing to adopt them!

Dr. Gawande goes into real detail not only in what makes a good checklist and how to develop them, but also why they work. They work by simply making sure that key simple steps are accomplished, and by freeing your brain from concerning itself about the easy stuff (since the checklist will catch anything you miss). This frees the brain to think about the hard stuff, and able to deal with complications more directly. Good checklists also make communications easier, so that when things do go wrong, the experts involved can address them more directly.

Fundamentally, time after time, in study after study… checklists WORK.

Summary

This is a hugely important book, and I honestly can’t recommend it more highly, It doesn’t matter what industry you’re in, if you deal with or manage complexity, you NEED to read it.

If you want to efficiently improve your performance or your teams’ performance quickly and substantially, a checklist is your way to do it.

So my old boat, the USS Hartford, was in a significant collision this week. While transiting (submerged) through the Straits of Hormuz, they ran into the USS New Orleans, an amphibious ship (surface ship that carries Marines). According to reports, about 15 people on the Hartford were hurt, though luckily none were seriously injured. The New Orleans had some tanks punctured, spilling about 25+k gallons of fuel oil.

The Hartford looks like it’s in pretty bad shape. Here are photos from the NavyTimes.com:

This one shows the sail bent over at an angle:

032009ap_hartford2_800.JPG

This shows the damage on the front of the sail, but you can also see where the bottom of the sail has pulled apart from the hull after being bent over:

032109ap_hartford_800.JPG

I can only imagine two scenarios about what happened. #1- The Hartford lost depth control and/or got sucked up in the wake of a big surface ship. (Unlikely but has happened.) #2- The Hartford was on its way to periscope depth and didn’t hear the New Orleans or realize it was as close as it was. Since the NavyTimes article quoted the Navy as saying the Hartford was “submerged but near the surface” it sounds like #2 is the right answer. Unfortunately this is not hugely uncommon; going to periscope depth is the most dangerous thing a submarine does regularly.

I feel really bad for the guys on the boat. I was on the Hartford when we grounded off of Italy in 2003; it’s an awful experience for everyone, whether you were personally involved or not. It causes a lot of disruption for the Navy and all the people involved. I’m no expert, but that damage is probably going to take a long time to fix.

[UPDATE]: More photos here from the Navy. The sail is pretty trashed. Lots of Navy-specific comments on Joel’s blog here.

web_090321-N-9909C-211.jpg
web_090321-N-9909C-993.jpg

[UPDATE 2]: Commenters on Joel’s blog have written that the Hartford experienced an 82-degree roll! If that’s even half-true (and it may very well not be) it’s amazing that only 15 people were hurt.

I got a kick out of seeing this video. It’s a timelapse video taken of a cruise ship going through the Panama Canal. The fun bits with locks are at the beginning and end; in the middle there’s quite a large lake that needs to be sailed across.

My old boat (the USS Hartford, SSN 768) sailed across the Panama Canal a year or two after I left; I’m still a bit jealous that I missed it. Going through the Suez wasn’t nearly as interesting, and I did that twice.

IraqiArt.jpg

This Thursday, May 22nd a very unique art exhibit will open in New York City. It features art from Iraqi artists, most of whom cannot even be publicly identified for their safety. It was a Navy Lieutenant serving in Iraq that found this art and worked to bring it over to the United States to exhibit and sell for the artists. I served with that Lieutenant, Chris Brownfield, for about two years when we were both stationed on the same submarine. He’s a very unique guy, as this initiative suggests!

From 2006 to 2007, a military liaison officer in the U.S. Embassy of Baghdad worked on the sidelines to develop relations with the artists of Baghdad. Under extremely unlikely circumstances, several of Baghdad’s artists trusted this military officer to share their art with the world. It is the first collection of art in the United States comprised entirely of works from wartime contemporaries of Iraq. The scope of the exhibition is unprecedented, including works on Iraqi refugees, the children of war, genocide, and an Iraqi perspective on Shock and Awe.

The exhibition is taking place at the Pomegranate Gallery on 133 Greene Street in SoHo (see map here). The opening reception runs from 6-8pm on Thursday May 22nd, and the exhibition will be open through June 21st.

Jake Halpern wrote a great article about the exhibit in New York Magazine. He even managed to speak (via phone) to a couple of the artists involved. One of my favourite parts of the article describes how Chris had to pull rank with the military postal clerks in order to send the 100+ paintings back to the US!

If you can’t make it to the gallery, Chris has also produced a book that includes much of the same artwork. It’s tri-lingual in English, French and Arabic. You can buy it from Amazon.com here: Oil on Landscape; Art from Wartime Contemporaries of Baghdad.

If you live in or near New York City, I hope you get a chance to drop in on the exhibit; it should be interesting.

So I was reading a little bit about General Petraeus today in the New York Times. I took a quick look at his Wikipedia article and found something very interesting, his wife.

While a cadet at the US Military Academy, aka West Point, he dated the commanding officer’s daughter!!

WOW!!

For a 19/20-year old cadet to date the daughter of the three-star general that ran West Point must have been one hell of a pressure cooker. But not only did he date her, he married her two months after graduation!

Colour me amazed…

I recently traded some interesting e-mails with Charlie O’Donnell, the Founder/CEO of Path101. If you haven’t heard of them now, I wouldn’t be surprised as they’re still very much in their development phase. But I think in the coming few years you certainly will have heard of and experimented with their website.

Path101 aims to build “a place for career discovery – a site where you can learn about all sorts of different career paths.” This is more than a networking site, more than an educational site, more than a recruitment site, and in fact manages to combine all of these to help people make wise decisions about their professional future. (At least, that’s what I understand they’re trying to do.)

If you’re reading this, you likely know that I spent six years in the US Navy as a submarine officer. (The examples I use below are very Navy submarine specific… my apologies to the Army/Marine Corps/Air Force folks out there.) This site could be very powerful for ex-military members, and put them on a path for a very successful post-military career. Here are some of the issues that military people have entering the wider job market:

  • You develop a great network in the military. It can be extremely powerful, but for most people it is very informal.
  • “Military experience” is way too broad. To adequately figure out what someone’s training is best suited for, you need to drill down to their designator/rating/rank.
  • Military members have excellent training and a great work ethic, but that’s very hard to translate into civilian terms.
  • The military is typically the only real professional experience ex-military members have when entering the job market.

After that email conversation, I started thinking about those issues, and how a site like Path101 could solve them. The more I thought about it, the more excited I became, largely because it could finally put some data-driven specifics behind what is commonly a very informal process. Here are some of my thoughts:

How a site like Path101 could help the military-to-civilian transition


First of all,

it could help formalise your network!! This is one of my biggest regrets in my military career. In the military, everyone is moving all the time and in the last few years I’ve already lost track of a number of great people I served with. Everyone in the military should use LinkedIn (or similar variant, though I don’t know of a better one) to keep in contact with friends, shipmates, supervisors, etc. Virtually no one does this now, and that’s really too bad. Most ex-military people I know would bend over backwards to help out someone they served with or a friend of someone they served with… you form lifetime bonds in the military. (See this post as an example.)

Fundamentally, you never know when you’re going to leave the military. To have a successful career, you need to constantly network. In this sense “networking” doesn’t mean kissing ass to get people to like you, it just means keeping track of people that you want to stay in touch with in your career. Already there are military groups on LinkedIn, such as (for me) the Gold Dolphins group and blog, to help take advantage of these relationships.

Secondly,

it could help show military members what they can specifically do based on their experience. Path101 is building what they call the “Resume Genome Project” which aims to take millions of resumes/c.v.’s to help you figure out what people with your background have done with their careers. Eventually this tool could be very powerful for military members looking to transition to the civilian world. If the resumes of other ex-military members were coded with the correct designators/rates/etc., you could see exactly what every ex-submarine officer did in their career after leaving as a JO, after leaving as a DH, after leaving as an CO/XO, etc. Nuclear Machinist Mates could see where all MM(N)’s went after they left the Navy. A Marine Corps MOS 0369 could take a look at where his training and education has fit best for others that have left the Corps.

This information could be invaluable to people leaving the military. I would predict that many submarine officers go to business school or law school, a lot of aviators go become corporate pilots, and submarine supply officers become international arms dealers. (Only slightly kidding on that last one!) But smart people are data-driven, and it would be VERY interesting to see the results of a Resume Genome Project for the military. The military tends to be very insular, and if people are only familiar with what their immediate friends and colleagues do after they leave the military, they may be missing out on a wealth of opportunities available for people with their training and background.

Finally,

Path101 could serve as an excellent knowledgeable and unbiased career advisor. For the vast majority of people leaving the military, it’s the only real professional experience they’ve ever had. Going back to university career advisors (for those people whom that’s even possible) is useless because they have no idea of what to do with military experience. While the military does provide transition assistance, having a source of unbiased advice would be extremely useful. People could use forums to help each other explain their military experience in civilian terms, teach people about unusual jobs/industries that come up in the Resume Genome Project, and more.

I personally believe that the military career advisors suffer from a lack of quality data, and thus tend to funnel people into the kinds of careers that are easy to funnel people into. Certain employers historically hire ex-military at much higher rates than other employers. (To me, that smells like untapped potential for a lot of employers.) If you have quality information on what people with your military background have done once they’ve gotten out and had a chance to connect with them and learn more about different opportunities, the career choices people make could potentially be very different.

Summary

The military is an amazing, life-changing experience for virtually everyone. It is a great career opportunity, but it can be difficult when transitioning back to the civilian world. I think Path101 could grow to be a great resource for military members as they look to leave the service. Having data and opportunities at their fingertips will allow them to make more informed and better decisions about their future. I really look forward to what Charlie and his team are building.

It turns out the Navy’s newest operational submarine (USS Virginia) is going up against my old boat in some war-gaming as they prepare for their first overseas deployment. From The Day:

Last week they were preparing for a war-gaming exercise with the USS Hartford (SSN 768), another Groton-based submarine, in which they planned to fire 12 exercise torpedoes.

[snip]

There is no comparison acoustically between a Virginia-class submarine like the Virginia and a Los-Angeles-class submarine like the Hartford, Hurt said. He refers to other classes as “Brand X.”

“In the submarine world, if you’re the quiet guy you’ll come out on top all the time,” he said. “Acoustically we’ll tear them up.”

This kind of thing was always fun, even though we were all pretty knackered by the end of it. And based on the improvements in submarine technology, I think the Hartford will likely get a thumping from a Virginia crew that’s been training their asses off for this.

I really wish I could get a tour of a Virginia-class boat sometime; though I’ve seen simulators of some of the panels both forward and aft, it would be great to see the real thing and talk to the crew to see what the new stuff can really do.

I spent three years on the USS Hartford (SSN-768). It was a fantastic experience, though I always talk about it in Dickensian terms…

It was the best of times, it was the worst of times…

- A Tale of Two Cities

I recently saw a video that reminded me of some of my more fond memories of the boat… watching dolphins play in our bow wake. This video is from the USS Wyoming (which has a higher sail than the Hartford, we were a bit closer to the surface) and is something that many submariners have seen at least at some point in their careers.

So here’s a little taste of submarine life.

Dolphins playing on the bow of the submarine USS Wyoming

Add to My Profile | More Videos

© 2010 blog.jedchristiansen.com Suffusion WordPress theme by Sayontan Sinha