Please see the Seed Accelerator Knowledge Base for the most up-to-date information on seed accelerators world-wide, and the startups that have graduated from them.
I’ve long been interested in the seed accelerator model, as started by Y Combinator. I wrote my master’s thesis on it, and wrote a follow-up post this spring. Recently, two things have happened that I wanted to write about. First, I restructured the spreadsheet where I maintained a list of all companies to come out of seed accelerators. And second, NESTA (National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts, a UK investment and research body) recently undertook a significant piece of research into seed accelerators.
Update to Seed Accelerator company list spreadsheet
As a part of my original paper on seed accelerators, I compiled a list of all the companies that have come out of seed accelerators like Y Combinator, TechStars, Seedcamp, et cetera. Each accelerator had its own tab, with the details of all their companies. I kept edit rights, mainly so that I could be sure of the details for my paper and follow-up work.
As seed accelerators have exploded in number world-wide, it’s become nearly impossible to keep this working. There were too many tabs for different accelerators to be found properly, and it really is best if the people that run the different programs can edit the details for their companies.
So there are now individual documents for each seed accelerator program, and the original document now has links to each individual program sheet. If you run a seed accelerator, please e-mail me and I’ll be sure that 1) I have a separate spreadsheet for your accelerator and 2) you get full edit rights for your program’s spreadsheet. ([email protected])
Please check the new seed accelerator company directory here.
Kirsten Bound and Paul Miller recently undertook a significant piece of work to define, describe, and analyze seed accelerators on a global basis. The result of which can be found on the NESTA page: “The Startup Factories“. [Direct link to their PDF paper.] I spoke to Kirsten a couple of times prior to and during their research, and they developed a real sense of the opportunities and challenges of startup accelerators.
While I didn’t have time to make NESETA’s half-day conference on seed accelerators last week, a friend of mine (Mark Littlewood of the BLN) did and wrote about it here: “Do we need startup factories?“. The key element can be found at the bottom of his post, where Mark echo’s something I’ve been saying since my very first paper. Only the best, top-tier seed accelerators will truly be of value to entrepreneurs. And the followers, the “me-too” seed accelerators that are starting to pop up everywhere, will be of little to negative value. While in the long run it will be easy to tell between the two, in the short term I am afraid that startup founders may get fleeced. Startup accelerators need to clearly understand their unique advantages that can allow them to recruit some of the best startups away from the Y Combinators and TechStars of the world. If they can’t offer that level of value, it might not be worth it for them to exist.
The NESTA report is quite well written and clear. Some of the data is a little dodgy; in particular I’m not a fan of the Tech cocktail rankings at all, since they have yet to mention what data they’re using to create the rankings. (I personally believe that it overly weights the accelerators that more freely share data.) But overall, it’s a great resource.
If you do have comments, please share them with the writers. The discussion paper is currently in draft form, but they hope to finalize it soon.